Escort ads may become illegal, charity warns

Legislative change headed by Harriet Harman could see an out-right ban on escort adverts in magazines.

news.PinkPaper.com
Thursday, 2 September 2010
8 March 2010
Legislative change headed by Harriet Harman could see an out-right ban on escort adverts in magazines.
The proposal comes as changes to the Policing and Crime Act would increase police powers to crack down on brothels and people who use their homes to sell sex.
 
Equalities Minister Harriet Harman has promised to introduce a proposal to fine publications up to £10,000 for printing escorting adverts, although prostitution itself would not be illegal. Although the proposal is intended to protect trafficked female sex workers, it is thought the change in law could also equally affect gay male prostitutes and so-called 'high class' escorts such as the author of Secret Diary of a Call Girl

But the Terrence Higgins Trust and the International Union of Sex Workers fear it might push sex workers into street work and to work for pimps.
 
Lisa Power of Terrence Higgins Trust told London gay magazine Boys: 'All of the work that's done on this is done from the sexist view that these things happen to women. We know the male escort industry is very different to the female industry and no one in political power has thought that through.'

Catherine Stephens from the International Union of Sex Workers said: 'I don't know of any gay escorts that have been trafficked. I'm sure there are illegal immigrant gay escorts but they're not being trafficked. There's a big difference between being an illegal immigrant and being trafficked.'

The IUSW opposes the proposal on the basis that it could endanger sex workers of all genders and backgrounds.

'If you stop people going into the office of a magazine to advertise then they're going to be driven into the hands of third parties and intermediaries as a way of getting work and they're much more likely to be exploited then,' Stephens continued.

Since many gay sex workers are self-employed, without working for agencies or brothels like many female sex workers, this could be a backwards step, pushing gay escorts into the situations that deprive them of power, Stephens argued.

There is also an increased chance of STIs being passed on if such proposals reduced the income and client base of male escorts.

'I think the sex work scene is pretty quiet the moment and one of the things that happens when there's a crackdown is that there's even less punters and so less ability to negotiate price. We see a decrease in safe sex because people are more likely to do things they don't want to do,' said Stephens.

One escort we spoke to, who asked to be referred to as Saul, said: 'I find this proposal deeply disturbing. It's like they actually want us to turn to streetwalking. It's much safer to advertise in the back of a magazine than to wander street corners in the dark or work for a pimp.'

Ireland has had a similar law for 15 years, which saw In Dublin magazine fined 63,000 Euros in 2002 for knowingly printing escort adverts. However, the law has had little impact on preventing prostitution, as figures suggest more people are engaged in sex work than ten years ago and trafficking is still a problem, say organisations like Ruhama, which represent sex workers.

Bookmark with:

| More
Story Comments
You must log in to add a comment. If you already have a PinkPaper account log in with your email address and password. If you’re a customer of Prowler Direct, Diva Direct, Gay Times, Diva Mag, Libertas or Expectations you can log in with those details.
- 3/15/2010 10:12:21 AM

re below, it doesn't read that the OP suggested you drink alchohol! Do people that drink alchohol despise you then? Be careful, you're in danger of alienating yourself completely here.

Report Abuse
- 3/14/2010 5:14:18 PM

Keep seeing your doctor and taking the medications. You will get better. PS. I don't drink alcohol.

Report Abuse
- 3/13/2010 10:43:30 AM

I think i figured you out, not on sick benefit, possibly a supermarket manager or something, but definitely the type of person who would walk up to someone in a pub while they were having a pint and playing on the fruit machine and start talking total shite to a guy who's never seen you before. The guy would walk away and sit atthe bar and ten minutes later you'd sit next to him and start blabbering again, the guy would put up with it for about another ten minutes after which he would finish his pint, get off his chair and put his coat on, then turn to you and punch you right in the mouth and while you were on the floor holding your teeth in he'd say 'why dont you just fuck off you twat', at which point he'd walk out of the pub to find a quieter one down the road. Now that may be 'biiiitchy' but its definately nasty, though i'm sure i got it just right. i'm definitely off for good now, and who knowsmaybe one day we'll meet in a pub?

Report Abuse
- 3/13/2010 10:27:31 AM

continued from below: ...are on sick benefit. good bye and fuck yourself, x

Report Abuse
- 3/13/2010 10:25:28 AM

Aww boo hoo, da nasty man told you where to go did he, diddums. Like i said, i never asked for your opinion on my opinion. Personally i wouldn't have given me the pleasure of reading my retort, let alone replying to it and all you can say after the garbage you wrote days ago is 'biiitchy'. If you didn't want 'biiitchy' why did you single me out for criticism of my opinion without even having your own opinion. You're right i am a nasty man, i mean i must be because every time i come head to head with a total wanker like yourself i just wanna pan their head in. And if you think that some one speaking up for themselves gets gay men a bad name then you need to get out more. I'm not gonna read this article anymore so i dont care what you write if anything, but from your last reply you are deffo full of shite, though i do believe you thatyour not a politician,i feel quite embarrased that i may have such an opinion of you, in hindsight, and if i had to guess, i would say it is more likely you

Report Abuse
- 3/12/2010 5:55:37 PM

You really are a nasty man. The type that gets gay men a bad name. Biiiitchy or what.

Report Abuse
- 3/12/2010 12:19:01 PM

also just noted you replied 'i'm not a politician', so at least you do admit you're full of shite then. Christ on a bike!

Report Abuse
- 3/12/2010 12:16:59 PM

So you think it’s unfair that I’m criticising Harman on a comment site designed to give points of view or criticism on an article about Harriet Harman!!! It would be a bit strange if I were criticising Royal Mail here. So you're happy about any comment relating to Harriet Harman’s Proposal above as long as it doesn’t' criticise Harman!! You're weird. I'll tell you what, so I don’t hurt your feelings (You're not Mr Harman are you?) I won’t call her a token or a wet sponge, though I still think she is. I'll change my view on the story, adopting the premise she's the best thing to hit politics since sliced bread, Lisa Power from the Terrence Higgins Trust is quoted above as believing the view that lovely Harman has adopted is sexist, the IUSW also believes it unnecessarily endangers workers in the industry of all genders and backgrounds. I believe that it's carpet bomb politics that will not directly target the issue for which she, lovely Harman, claims it is intended. As usual for her.

Report Abuse
- 3/12/2010 12:14:10 PM

Continued from above; I will not spread my criticism to politicians of other parties because this article is not about them at all, it’s about her. When politicians I can’t stand have an article I don’t agree with it'll be their turn. Till then, in my view, she’s a shite politician doing a shite job, and until I hear of anything she's done positive for me that’s what she'll remain, I’m allowed my view I'M PAYING HER. And FYI this isn't a discussion forum, its a comment site about the articles above, so I’m not interested in your opinion about me or whether I read the beano or the financial times as for all I know your sitin in HMP Parkhurst plotting you're next stalking campaign of Harriet Harman. go get your own life or have another fishermans friend either way get knotted, prick. X

Report Abuse
- 3/11/2010 9:25:01 PM

I am not a politician just think it really unfair that someone like Harman who has strongly supported equality is being singled out for your criticism. There are many other politicians from all parties that deserve criticism for many reasons and perhaps Harman herself for somethings but I cannot agree she is a "wet sponge". This is Daily Mail talk,catch yourself on.

Report Abuse
- 3/11/2010 1:07:23 PM

Hmm, some tory! Sitting here in me pants ranting on about harriet harman. me thinks you're a politician, full of shite

Report Abuse
- 3/10/2010 5:07:24 PM

methinks your a tory.

Report Abuse
- 3/9/2010 2:52:54 PM

black blue gay staright man woman wig tory, still harriet harmen, i stand by it, still a wet sponge, still not up to the job, still gordons token in what is otherwise an all male cabinet. not sexist, harmanist!

Report Abuse
- 3/9/2010 2:03:40 PM

RE: 'Perhaps Teresa May might be more to your liking.' (below), exactly, harriet harman is the best of a bad bunch but there a far more experianced mps who would have better suited the job. She IS the only female cabinet member and the least experianced for the role. Other female members more suited to the job are in the house of lords. Therefore leaving harriet harman the most qualified 'female' for the position, that to me is says token, as there are simply other mps more suited to the role. Im sure Brown would agree an all male cabinet would look unpopular in lead to the next election. With regard the issue in hand, it may do something to tackle traffiking but ultimately a broad blanket on advertising would likely net more in fines than legislation aimed directly at the issue for which harriet harman would lead you to believe it is intended. Think about it, legislation and fines will never be paid by traffikers and tougher sentences will just cost the treasury. She may not have inte

Report Abuse
- 3/9/2010 10:53:54 AM

the reason why I said sexist was the comment "token female". Labour has many faults but when did you last see a conservative home secretary? I do not like Harman but she is hardly a "token".

Report Abuse
- 3/9/2010 10:51:49 AM

Harriet Harman and people like her in the Labour party draw particular hatred from Toryfolk. The feel that because a person is from a middle or upper class background they naturally should be tories. Harman has pushed forward the equality agenda and especially the rights of woman and girls. I do agree somewhat that the proposed changes to the law will be a very blunt instrument but regardless I do think Harman's motivation on this one is for the good and she does not deserved to be criticised for it. That being said I wouldn't vote for her personally but I will be voting for my local Labour candidate because he has been a hard worker and deserves my vote. I would normally vote Liberal Democrat but just cannot stand the thought of the tories back in power.

Report Abuse
- 3/9/2010 2:50:30 AM

In response to the previous comment: I'm not sure the OP's comments are sexist. I think s/he just dislikes Harriet Harman in general. The problem is, Harman's proposals wouldn't stop any type of prostitution. They'd merely push those sex workers who are in control of their situations into more risky activities that are not in the country's best interests. I understand she wants to stop women being trafficked, but wouldn't specific legislation for the trafficking of women for prostitution be better? Tighter penalties should exist for those who profit off coersive or forced prostitution, and greater resources need to be available for reporting this coersion. I doubt very much pimps advertise their girls in magazines (why spend the money when they can make them walk in wind, rain and snow around redlight districts instead?).

Report Abuse
- 3/8/2010 5:25:57 PM

I do not for one minute think that it is Harman's intention to stop gay escorts. The big issue that she has had to deal with is trafficked woman and girls. Prostitution is not generally about sex. It is about people being used and very often abused. Your comments are sexist to the extreme. Harman isnt my favourite person but she seems capable and up to the job. She certainly gives the tories a good thrashing when she is standing in for PMQs. Perhaps Teresa May might be more to your liking. NAAAAsty

Report Abuse
- 3/8/2010 2:34:56 PM

Well come on, it's harriet harman. She has to have something to do to justify her wage from the public purse. the token female face of the labour party. every time you see her imagine her head replaced with a dripping wet sponge, both are as as good as the other. the real problem is she always does more harm than good, a reckless moron. It'll be interesting to see what morons the conservatives will replace the current lot with, urghh scary!!

Report Abuse
Facebook
Twitter