Labour's Harriet Harman backs down on Equality Bill

Harriet Harman, the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, has backed down against forcing religious leaders to implement equality on who they can employ via legislation.

news.PinkPaper.com
Friday, 10 September 2010
3 February 2010

Harriet Harman, the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, has backed down against forcing religious leaders to implement equality on who they can employ via legislation.

The news comes just days after the Pope claimed the Equality Bill promotes discrimination against religious communities, by forcing them to hire gay, lesbian or bisexual staff in non-liturgical posts - despite being law since 2003.

His diatribe, coupled with recent opposition in the Lords, means that Harman - the Equalities Minister - will no longer fight our corner on the issue.   

“We have never insisted on nondiscrimination legislation applying to religious jobs, such as being a vicar, a bishop, an imam or a rabbi,” she said today.

“Religious organisations can decide themselves how to do that. However, when it comes to non-religious jobs, those organisations must comply with the law. We thought that it would be helpful for everyone involved to clarify the law, and that is what the amendment ... aimed to do. That amendment was rejected, so the law remains as it was.”

Although Harman made no mention of the Pope’s visit to Britain this year, it is understood that the Government did not want the dispute to overshadow preparations.

Despite prompting outrage from the likes of Peter Tatchell, the Pope's comments have also gained support. Writing in The Times today, Lord Sacks, the Chief Rabbi, says: “There are times when human rights become human wrongs ... a political ideology, relentlessly trampling down everything in their path. This is happening increasingly in Britain, and it is why the Pope’s protest against the Equality Bill ... should be taken seriously.”

Ben Summerskill, chief executive of Stonewall, responded by stating that the gay rights organisation would support people who wanted to legally challenge discrimination by religious establishments. “If any church dismisses someone from a non-liturgical role, such as a youth worker or a press officer, we will support their case,” he said.

George Broadhead, from the Pink Triangle Trust, told PinkPaper.com: "This abject climb-down has obviously been prompted by the Pope's recent criticism of the pro-gay clause in the Bill and is a clear indication, if any were needed, of the continuing malign political influence exerted by the Catholic Church."

Bookmark with:

| More
Story Comments
You must log in to add a comment. If you already have a PinkPaper account log in with your email address and password. If you’re a customer of Prowler Direct, Diva Direct, Gay Times, Diva Mag, Libertas or Expectations you can log in with those details.
- 2/9/2010 2:32:31 PM

this is typical harriet harmon u should resign now u are a disgrace to be allowed to continues to serve,just another empty promise from this government to allow this bigoted prejudice to continue, why is the church allowed to discriminate against a gay person,surely under equality bill everyone should be treated as equal regardless of there sexual orientation,but this doesn't seem to matter where the catholic church is involved they'd rather abuse young boys and sweep it under the carpet,as for the head of the catholic church,he was an active memeber of the nazi party whom desimated over 6 million jews and other minorities,he should be banned from coming into the uk with his bigoted views,

Report Abuse
- 2/5/2010 4:58:38 PM

Thank goodness for the Secular Society and the European Courts. It's obvious that this Pope is just an old fashioned bigot and he really shouldn't be interfering in the British legislative process. This just points out how religion and matters of state in this country should be separated. The modern world has largely moved on from those prejudiced views and can now see how unneccessary and damaging they have been to 'life, liberty and the persuit of happiness for all'. These discriminatory religions must see that we are all deserving of respect and part of a much greater entity, known as humanity, than their narrow view point.

Report Abuse
- 2/5/2010 2:02:31 PM

oach. The Vatican is presently embroiled in money-laundering scandals, taking out insurance policies against claims of sexual misconduct and no end of criminal behaviour.

Report Abuse
- 2/5/2010 2:01:36 PM

I'm surprised the report didn't mention that the intervention of the unelected religionists in the House of Lords over legal advice that this was unconstitutional means the Secular Society can now press ahead and take this to the European Courts. The Pope's tried this on before. After Spanish President Zapatero introduced gay marriage in the spirit of equality (unlike our lacklustre lot that introduced Marriage-Lite and wonders why str8s are taking the government to the European Courts because they can't have it), he took further actions. The Spanish socialists - no doubt driven by memories of the appalling crimes committed by the Catholic Church as it sided with the fascist dictatorship - stripped the Church of its privileges, stopped proselytising in schools, took down the crucifix in public places and supported women's rights to abortion. So the Pope made a visit. While his Church stirred up trouble, evoked demonstrations, Zapatero refused to meet him. That was the dignified appr

Report Abuse
- 2/3/2010 8:50:01 PM

I am a Labour member and will continue to support the party regardless of this because of the good things that have happened since labour came to power. However I am very disappointed at Harman. She has been knobbled by the RC church and the nazi party member pope. However LGBT people shouldnt let this setback make them turn to the evil tory party. The tories will dismantle our rights within 2 parliaments. Protest to Harman but then vote tactically to keep the tories out.

Report Abuse
- 2/3/2010 5:11:06 PM

As most of troubles started with the jewish scriptures, is anyone surprised that jonathan sacks thinks ratzinger is right to oppose human rights for gays?

Report Abuse
Facebook
Twitter