House of Lords retains homophobic loop-hole

The fight against homophobia suffered a blow in the House of Lords today, as voters retained an amendment that legitimises the defence of free speech in cases involving the incitement of anti-gay hatred.

news.PinkPaper.com
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
9 July 2009
The fight against homophobia suffered a blow in the House of Lords today, as voters  retained an amendment that legitimises the defence of free speech in cases involving the incitement of anti-gay hatred.

The amendment to the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act permits the "discussion or criticism" of sexual practices, including the use of threatening language to urge someone to change their sexual orientation.

The Lords voted 186-133 to keep the amendment, a margin of 53 votes. The House of Commons, where the bill will return later this year, voted in March to remove the amendment by a margin of 154.

Lord Waddington, the Conservative Home Secretary under Margaret Thatcher who tabled the amendment, insisted that each individual case must be considered: "One must look at the circumstances and the manner in which the words are spoken to see whether they were in fact threatening and driven by hate."

Famous faces including actors Rowan Atkinson and Christopher Biggins campaigned earlier this year to show their concerns with the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, which they believed would curtail freedom of expression and lead to comedians being prosecuted for jokes about sexual orientation.

Mike Judge, Head of Communications at The Christian Institute, also welcomed the Lords’ decision: “Genuine supporters of free speech will be pleased with this result.

“Too many Christians have already been intimidated by over-zealous police action because they gave voice to their views on sexual ethics. Surely the world is big enough to allow all sides to express their beliefs about sexual behaviour without fearing a knock on the door from the police”.

The Ministry of Justice, however, labelled the defeat “disappointing”, and will seek to overturn the decision in the Commons.



Story Comments
You must log in to add a comment. If you already have a PinkPaper account log in with your email address and password. If you’re a customer of Prowler Direct, Diva Direct, Gay Times, Diva Mag, Libertas or Expectations you can log in with those details.
- 7/13/2009 11:13:32 PM

It would appear our government is openly homophobic - is this why funding for GLBT support keeps getting cut? one rule for the general public and another for the government no wonder their is so much homophobia - may as well bring back section 28 while they are at it. - its 2009 and sexual freedom still doesn't exist.

Report Abuse
- 7/11/2009 6:37:54 PM

The tories will continue to do everything they can to block our path to equality. Gays and lesbians who vote for the tories should be totally ashamed of themselves. Mind you they are probably all self loathing anyway so they have enough to contend with. The so-called artists who support this anti-gay legislation should be boycotted by us.

Report Abuse
- 7/10/2009 4:15:28 PM

We should not have to endure deliberate verbal homophobic abuse from bigoted people in the political parties and groups like the Countryside Alliance and BNP. In Dorset these groups shower one in homophobic abuse all the time by snooping and spying on everything one does to make themselves money. Its worse than other regimes. They spie on everything one does and destroy other countries like IRAQ where all the Gays and thousands of civilians have beeen killed. The right to love is a human right which should be free from their deliberate homophobic abuse and phycological warefare. Offcourse people have their own opionions but they should not incite violence against gays all the time. The House of Lords should be taken to the European Court in Strasbourg. Indian Gays deserve equality which is supposed to be enjoyed by Gays in the west and bigoted old Tory lobbies in Bournemouth and elesewhere who still support the politics of apartheid should not be able to deny this to them. Quite o

Report Abuse
- 7/10/2009 3:50:43 PM

This loophole must be closed at once otherwise it allows alsorts of bigots to get around the law.

Report Abuse
Facebook
Twitter